Monday, March 30, 2009

Friday Monkey Shiraz 2007

I think it was George Michael who penned these immortal words, which I am quoting from memory:

Why don't you do it?
Why don't you set your monkey free?
When you get right to it,
do you love your monkey or do you love me?

The song is, I dunno, an ode to pocket pool? Or maybe it's really about a monkey. Who knows? Whatever it's about, it serves as a terrific introduction to this review, because tonight I am reviewing an Australian Shiraz called Friday Monkey. And, even better, I now have the perfect excuse to drink wine and sing "monkey (Mon-kay!) monkey (mon-kay-ay!)" at the top of my lungs. What better way could there be to spend an evening?

All I can say is, this monkey's gone to heaven!

And Australia has finally brought something to the table. Light, easy to drink. Would probably pair just as well with a bag of Cheetos as a family dinner. This wine was recommend to us at The Wine Seller, a wine shop in our hometown of Herndon, VA. Check out their web page, which is infinitely more exciting than the shop itself. The proprietor did not seem terribly interested in our blog, but he made a damned good recommendation for a cheap red wine. I'd drink this again in a heartbeat, though if I had my druthers (where are those confounded druthers, anyway) I'd probably go with the 2006 Carmen Syrah Joy recommended last night.

Anyway, it's a good wine for sharing with friends. 7 out of 10. Come on and take it easy.

The Wine Seller, $8.99

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Carmen Syrah 2006

I'm happy to end this week with a wine that reaffirms my belief in the superiority of red wines over any other type of wine. Finally!

I should say that I'm relieved, more than happy, because I strayed this past week. I cheated and had affairs with a sample tray of Lancaster County (PA) brewed beers, multiple glasses of sangria, and a single glass of pinot grigio. Harlot! Before you judge me further by the amount of alcohol I've consumed this past week, I should explain that it's been my Birthday Week Extravaganza. Or Hell Week, if you're my husband. It's the annual celebration of all things 'Joy' and this year I managed to stretch the festivities out for a whole week. Over the course of this glorious week I didn't have any red wine and in fact, I believe I purposely sought out alternatives. My loyalty has been tested lately because I haven't quite found a favorite red wine that costs less than $10 through this blog or otherwise. I was starting to think I had expensive taste in red wine and couldn't be satisfied with cheap red wines. Luckily, I poured myself a glass of this Syrah tonight and realized all is right in my world. Tasty yet expensive red wines be damned. This one's a keeper.

According to the label, this wine hails from Chile's oldest wine house and this particular line was inspired by the legacy of one man's love for his wife Carmen. If my husband was ever inclined to create a wine in my honor, I imagine he wouldn't call it Joy, especially after this particular week. Unfortunately for him, I don't think he'd get too far marketing bottles with the names he'd come up with. Though who knows, a bottle labeled 'Obnoxious' is bound to catch the eye.

I had a very spicy bowl of chili before drinking this wine and was quite pleased with the effect. The label on the back of the bottle specifies that this Syrah pairs well with red meats, spicy foods, and strongly flavored cheeses. However, I think this wine does fine on its own. No need to pair it with other flavors. I imagine I'll have a glass of this wine to wind down after a long, hard day at work. It's very smooth and lacks the sharpness that most Syrahs I've tasted have.

I'm pleased to give this wine an 8.5 out of 10.


Wine.com, $8.29

*Interesting side note: If you ever find yourself in Lancaster, PA, please visit the Lancaster Brewery. They make damn good beer. Or is that just the sample tray talking?

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Francis Ford Coppola Presents Rosso and Bianco 2005

How does one "present" a wine anyway? Does Coppola own the winery or does he just slap his name on the labels for marketing purposes? I know he owns a winery, but does he own this winery? It's all so showbizzy. Like putting Tom Cruise's name as a producer because he once might have read the script and you need the publicity.

I've wanted to review a Francis Ford Coppola wine for awhile. Not because I like his wine, but because I love his movies. Unfortunately, this leaves me with a distinct problem. I want to write a really clever, inspired review. Something like this:

Sonoma. Shit, I'm still in Sonoma. Every time I think I'm going to wake up back in the jungle. After my first tour it was worse. I'd wake up and there'd be Zinfandel. Then Cabernet and Syrah. When I was here I wanted to be there. When I was there I only wanted to be back in the jungle. I've been here a week now, waiting for a mission, getting softer. Everybody gets what he wants. I wanted a mission, and I got one, brought up to me like room service: Drink this shit and write about it. God I badly wanted to get up that river . . .

Unfortunately, the wine does not justify such a review. 51% Zinfandel. 29% Syrah. 20% Cabernet Sauvignon. Kinda spicy. Sharp. It's pleasant enough but uninspiring.

Leave the wine, take the cannoli.

5 out of 10.

Wine.com, $7.99

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Luzon Jumilla Spain 2007

I was determined to like this wine. So much so that I've waited a couple of days to write my review. Because I agree with Mike's last post; we are totally prejudiced to red wines and have become frustrated that our favorite wines so far with this blog have been whites. It's gotten so bad that I found myself ordering a pinot grigio when I had dinner with a friend last week. The horror. What made it worse is that I loved it. I should have written down the name of the wine but that would mean admitting that I've secretly become a fan of white wine. My capacity for denial is unmatched in this world.

The good news is that I do like this wine, now that I've had several glasses of it over the past few days. I have to admit that if I had attempted to blog about this wine after my first glass, I wouldn't have had too many good things to say about it. So, I just kept drinking. When all else fails, I say have another glass. I kept drinking until I realized that once I got past the initial bitter flavor (the label references hints of licorice mint), I actually liked the overall taste of the wine. It's a Monastrell-Syrah combo so it's definitely on the dry side but the richness of flavor won't fail to warm you up on the inside as you drink it down. It's a very strong wine. Fix a steak to go with it. Or a big steaming pot of beef stew.

I'll give it a 7 out of 10.

Wine.com, $7.99

Help us find more cheap reds to taste and love! It's one thing to start liking white wines because of this blog but I would like to find reds that remind me of why I was such a huge red wine drinker in the first place. Suggestions? Email us at wineforthecheap@gmail.com or leave your suggestions on our Facebook Page 'Wine For The Cheap' (if you're a facebook member, just type in our page name in the search box and it will pop up in the results).

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Hugel Gentil 2006

Boy am I glad for tonight.

I entered into this whole blogging thing with one distinct prejudice, that red wine is good and white wine is not as good. I don't say that as a universal absolute, it's merely my opinion. But while it is my opinion that red wine is better than white wine, I usually prefer that people who say differently stand far, far away from me. I'm happy in my little world of red wine superiority and, while I believe that everyone has the right to their own opinion, I really only care to hear mine. So you can sit in the dining room and sip your chardonnay with all the fish eaters. I'll be in the kitchen, with the cool folks, eating a burger. A veggie burger, granted. With little sprigs of mint. But still, I'll eat it raw and drink my pinot noir straight from the bottle.

Anyway, that's how we roll where I come from. So the last few weeks have been troubling as Hell. First we sampled our favorite, the Amaicha Torrontes and I started to think damn, maybe I do like white wine. That was followed by the Fetzer Gewurztraminer and I started to get worried. Then came Clean Slate Riesling which, while not as good as the other two, still capped a consistent streak for white wines sampled on this blog. At the same time, we've been reviewing mediocre red after mediocre red. So I have been on the brink of conversion.

But no more. Tonight it's Hugel Gentil 2006, replete with the syrupyness I've always found such a turn off with white wines. Whew. All is right with the universe.

If you like whites, you'll like it, I guess. But you'll like the others better.

5 out of 10.

Wine.com, $7.99

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Macaroni Grill House Chianti

Joy and I have been felled by the flu the last couple of days. Normally, we try to post every other day, or at least every third day, but unless you want to read my review of Nyquil (a gentle hint of anise gives way to a soaring, dry-heaveable finish that lingers for three days) there isn't much for us to post about. Any wine we were to try would have no taste to it, and would likely react with the dangerous amounts of antihistamine coursing through our bloodstreams. I mean, I can think of a lot of reasons to have your stomach pumped, but to do so for a wine blog? Not unless there were scads of free publicity involved.

Anyway, without sampling anything new, I'd like to take a second to talk about an old friend I was fortunate to sample once again about a week back. That would be the house chianti at Macaroni Grill. Macaroni Grill, for those of you who don't know, is a big, boxy chain Italian restaurant that has sprouted like fungus in a lot of suburban areas. It has moderately-priced Italian food and a pleasant enough family atmosphere, which makes it a nice evening out. However, to me the highlight has always been the house chianti which, while indistinct in almost every discernible way, is so refreshingly void of offense that you don't even know you're drinking it. That's bad, I suppose, if you're trying to impress your date, but good if you're trying to get your date drunk. Did I mention that one of my first dates with Joy was at the Macaroni Grill in Arlington, VA? That was right after the date when I took her to the landfill. Anyway, I've digressed.

The chianti has some nice berriness about it. I've always loved the fact that they don't serve it in any sort of a wine glass, but instead in a tumbler, suitable for your favorite soda. I've always wondered if, as the night wears on and they have to dig further in the cupboard, they start serving people wine in Scooby-Doo jelly jars and those big plastic cups you get at sporting events. Perhaps this is some kind of traditional thing that I'm not hip to, but it amuses me to no end and gives the serving of wine a generic, everyman quality that appeals to me greatly.

On our last visit, I asked the waitress who manufactures the chianti. I figured it has to be sold under a different name in a store and I could, perhaps, buy some to drink at home. She informed me that Macaroni Grill owns these vast vineyards in Tuscany where they grow their own grapes and painstakingly stomp out wine with their own blistered feet. A lovely story, but total bullcrap. From a little research on the web, it looks like it's manufactured by Navelle vineyards in California (not Tuscany) and is nearly identical to a chianti they sell under the Almaden brand name. So look for that as a later review. Almaden, by the way, is one of the biggest names in boxed wine typically found in your local supermarkets.

So now you know.

I give the Macaroni Grill House Chianti 7 out of 10. I have no price information because it's not sold by the bottle under that name.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Rolling Estate Wines Shiraz 2005

I've realized that being a wine reviewer comes with certain disadvantages. As a blogger, I am required to try new wines on a regular basis, which means that if I come across one I really enjoy, I can't savor it. I need to move on and find new wines to satisfy the insatiable appetites of the demanding ball-breakers we kindly refer to as you, our fans. The end result here being that I spend quite a bit of time sampling mediocre wines I don't want to drink instead of enjoying great ones I've already discovered. And on that note, I move on to tonight's review: Rolling Estate Wines Shiraz 2005.

Now don't get me wrong. It's not a bad Shiraz. It's fruity, with a little bit of spice, a lovely color, and a rather pleasant although not altogether memorable finish, as the wineys say. But I can tell you right now that in a grocery store stocked full of wine, I will not seek out the Rolling Estate Wines Shiraz. And in a store that only sold two wines, one of which I'd never heard of, the other being Rolling Estate Wines Shiraz, I'd purchase the other wine. But only if it's under $10.

In fact, everything about this wine is uninspiring. Rolling Estate Wines? What a boring name for a vineyard. Why not call it something exciting, like, I dunno, Tsunami Apocalyptico Wines or The Land of Big Boobs Inc. Give me 10 seconds with a pencil and I guarantee I'll come up with a more exciting moniker. And the description on the back? "Named after the beautiful rolling hills of the Central Ranges in . . . " Snooze.

Let me just say that since we started this blog Australia has not shown us anything. We've sampled several Australian wines now and not one has risen above the level of mediocre. Perhaps that will change, but so far South America is kicking Australia's ass. I almost feel like I'm watching soccer.

Anyway, I give it 5 out of 10.

Wine.com, $9.79

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

A Night of Food, Friends, and Pipi du Chat


I'm taking a break from our usual posts tonight to write about a fantastically fun evening I recently spent with two of my dearest friends, in celebration of this blog. We were also just in need of a girls' night. Plus there's no denying Meg's infectious enthusiasm when she starts to plan anything really. You just find yourself along for the (extremely entertaining) ride. A night with her, our friend Karin, cheap wine, and tons of food sounded like heaven.

Oh, and then there was this game we decided to play, in honor of the blog. Wine Discovery, by L'Atelier du Vin.

I shouldn't say we actually played; I don't even know if it comes with a rule booklet. If you've ever come across this game, you know that it's highly entertaining straight out of the box. Let me preface my explanation by saying there was a lot of wine flowing that night and a lot had been consumed by the time Meg brought the box out. In other words, there wasn't a chance in Hades we would have been able to follow any directions, even if they had been included in the box.

The game includes about 40 tiny caps that contain various scents of popular flavors used in wines. According to their website, the game is a 'Tasting Method that helps you discover the vintage, the region of origin or the appellation of the wine'. I don't know about all that but I definitely learned way more about the scents and um, flavors, they supposedly use in wines. Tea? Lavender? Mould?

And my personal favorite: Pipi du Chat, otherwise known as Cat Urine.

On that note, happy drinking! I challenge you to find me a wine that uses cat pee as a scent or flavor. Who wants to bet they only use that in the really expensive bottles of wine?

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Wrongo Dongo 2007

This is the hardest review I've ever had to write. Wrongo Dongo. Two words that conjure up so much possibility, all of it unbelievably adolescent. For the first time I am totally stumped by how to approach a review. I wanted to pretend that Wrongo Dongo was really the name of an 80s New Wave group founded by Danny Elfman. Then I wanted to compare it to that model of prurient stupidity "Wango Tango" by Ted Nugent. Then I concocted an unbelievably confusing scenario in which a drunken, lisping Ronald McDonald founds a wine company and names it after himself. And don't even get me started on other euphemistic possibilities I've considered as fodder for this review.

But I'm above that.

I'd like to take a second here to congratulate my beautiful wife, Joy, on her review last night of Big Tattoo Red. I cannot imagine that a nerdier wine review has ever been written, and that's really saying something. Nerdiness is a prerequisite for reviewing wine. Did she really write that she wants to "freak the dream?" Oh my God. Somebody please pry the remote control from that woman's hands.

Anyway, I've digressed. Wrongo Dongo. I have nothing interesting to say about Wrongo Dongo the wine. It comes from the Jumilla region of Spain. It's a red. It's a Monastrell, although you won't find that information on the bottle. It's a lovely violet color and has a real grapy taste to it (of course, nobody will ever say their wine tastes grapy, even if it does). It's got a picture of a yellow guy on the label who looks like he's been smoking something along with his wine, if you know what I mean. I imagine it'll pair quite well with pot roast.

But overall, there's not much to say about it. So back to the stupidity!


The Dongo took my baby!


Doctor, I need some lotion. My Dongos gone Wrongo.


Okay, I'm finished.


5 out of 10.


Wine.com, $7.99

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Big Tattoo Red Cabernet-Syrah 2006

It's beyond time for me to freak the dream this week, people.

Mike and I try not to let too much time lapse between posts but due to the latest American Idol (AI) shocker and the finale of America's Best Dance Crew (ABDC) this week, I've been a little distracted. And while some of you (Mike included) may be rolling your eyes right now, I'll tell you why I like both of those shows. They indulge the cheesiest part of me, the part that rejoices in seeing random strangers reach for and realize their dreams. I'm always impressed with the stubborn optimism the contestants have on these types of shows. They really believe they'll win, or at the very least, gain a following that will help jump-start their careers. It's all that they seem to know. As the first all-female crew to reach the finals on America's Best Dance Crew, the Beat Freaks embodied this sentiment the best when they implored the audience members and viewers at home to stay persistent in 'freaking their own dreams'. And don't get me started on Anoop Desai of American Idol. He gets me all misty-eyed, I won't lie.

So, with that in mind, this blog is how I freak my dream. I wasn't joking several posts ago when I said that I secretly wished I could quit my day job to blog about wine full-time. It's the most fun part of my life right now and I try to channel the persistent optimism of all those AI and ABDC contestants as I approach each post I write for this blog. One day this blog will be all that I know.

In keeping with this spirit, I chose tonight's wine because the purchase of this particular wine helps to fund the dream that the Bartholomaus Brothers freak, at Big Tattoo Wines. For every bottle sold, the brothers donate 50 cents to various hospice and breast cancer related charities, in honor of their late mother Liliana. This particular Cab-Syrah blend was cooked up in Chile. It's very dry and has a sharp kick to it as you swallow but boy does it ever warm you up on the inside. While I didn't have this with a meal, I imagine it pairs well with cheeses and meats as opposed to chicken and/or seafood. Big Tattoo Wines offers other types of wine, whites included. They have a neat link on their website that shows you where their wines are sold in any state. Help them freak their dream!

I'll give it a 6 out of 10.


Wine.com, $9.29

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Big House Red 2005

I am a sucker for marketing. I mean, seriously, when you go to the store to buy wine (or anything, for that matter) what do you typically choose? Do you go for the wine in the plain white label, or the one that catches your eye? When picking wines for this blog we may use user recommendations, or reviews, or some other criteria, but typically we're just looking for something to catch our eye. And so it is that on our recent browse through Wine.com I selected Big House Red. I thought the label looked cute.

And, you know, "big house." Like prison? Get it?

Clever.

Anyway, I didn't realize it at the time but Big House Red, and Big House wines overall, are part of a large marketing campaign gone completely out of control. I went to their web site at http://www.bighousewines.com/ to learn more before my review only to find that the entire prison motif embodies some ideological obsession with screw top caps that borders on the insane. "Yadda yadda yadda, Warden! Break outta the confines of stuffy tradition with the Stelvin(tm)" it says on the bottle, as if calling the cap Stelvin gives it some kind of grandeur, like calling your leather Corinthian. And then the web site leads you through a caricatured prison rather impossible to navigate for somebody like me, who has the attention span of a gnat and only wants to know if the wine tastes good with spinach.

Big House Red claims to be a blend of Sangiovese, Corignone, Syrah, Barbera, Mourvèdre, Petite Verdot, Montepulciano, Zinfandel, Tannat, Aglionico and Charbono. Or basically all the leftover, used-up, resquashed remains from other, higher-priced wines. It's a perfect wine for somebody like me, who seeks out a good bargain and refers to his wine as "wine," but it is kind of like finding out your girlfriend dated everybody else at the frat house before she finally got around to you. I mean, you still like her, I guess. But you brush your teeth after you kiss.

A decent red. Not great, but not terrible. 5 out of 10.

Wine.com, $8.49